HomeUploadUpload DirectHotlinkRandomAbouttheme toggle
Expand

Politicians Want to Destroy Section 230, the Internet's First Amendment

Views:1038
@ReasonVids

Reason's Elizabeth Nolan Brown reviews four myths about Section 230, the law that protects free speech online, put out by politicians and media personalities.
------------------
Subscribe to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/reasontv
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magazine/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reason
Subscribe to our podcast at Apple Podcasts: https://goo.gl/az3a7a

Reason is the leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines.
----------------
Television personalities and politicians, from Tucker Carlson to Nancy Pelosi, are calling for changes to the law that has protected the internet since the '90s. But they don't seem to have a clue about what it actually says, or whom it really protects.

Section 230 is a portion of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. It has made the internet as we know it possible by establishing that tech companies are not responsible for what their users post on their apps, websites, and devices. Section 230 allows for the free exchange of ideas on the internet—and it may be just as important to online free speech as the First Amendment.

Section 230's most important sentence reads as follows:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

Critics have come up with creative ways of distorting what the law says. Here are four myths to watch out for:

Myth 1: Tech Companies Must Be Neutral

"Neutrality" is not a condition of the law. Section 230 was designed in part so that internet companies could discriminate by filtering out content that's illegal, indecent, or otherwise objectionable. Before Section 230, online companies feared that any moderation would make them legally liable for user content. Section 230 explicitly says that's not the case—"good faith" and "voluntary" attempts to filter out unwanted posts and users are OK. 

Without Section 230, it would be hard for companies to avoid lawsuits and criminal charges without either becoming cesspools of totally unmoderated speech or banning user-generated speech entirely.

Myth 2: Section 230 Makes a Distinction Between Platform and Publisher

There is no legal distinction in Section 230 between a "publisher" and a "platform." The word "platform" doesn't even appear. What matters for legal purposes is who is responsible for creating particular web content. 

Judgment calls about user speech—however poorly executed, and whatever ideological biases are apparent—just don't affect whether a company is broadly protected by Section 230 or not.

Myth 3: Section 230 Shields Big Tech From Legal Liability

People like to pretend 230 created a legal "loophole," but the congress that passed Section 230 back in 1996 was explicit: Section 230 would not apply when it comes to federal criminal laws or intellectual property law. That means copyright violators and serious criminals do not get a free pass because of Section 230.

What the law does provide is limited protection from criminal charges brought by state or local law authorities and some immunity from getting sued in civil court.

This immunity is lost if a company:

Creates illegal content itself or edits content in a way that contributes to its illegality
Participates in illegal acts to obtain content
Engages in or profits directly from some illicit action

Section 230 is meant to leave room for holding online operators accountable for their own sins but not for those of their customers.

Myth 4: Section 230 Is Only for Large Tech Companies

Section 230 doesn't only benefit companies. As attorney Jeff Kosseff, author of The 26 Words That Created the Internet, puts it: "There also are significant free speech benefits to the public."

Section 230 shields not just the providers of digital services from litigation but the users of these services, too. Without it, anyone could find themselves liable for retweeting, reblogging, or posting links to content that is later found to break the law.

Yet for all the protections it provides to readers, writers, academics, shitposters, entrepreneurs, activists, and amateur political pundits of every persuasion, Section 230 has somehow become a political pariah.

The political class wants everyone to believe that the way the U.S. has policed the internet for the past quarter-century has actually been lax, immoral, and dangerous.

Don't believe them. The future of free speech—and a lot more—may depend on preserving Section 230.

Written by Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Edited by Paul Detrick.

Giant by The Grand Affair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Source: https://www.youtube.com/audiolibrarydownload?vid=46110e91d40fbb0c

libertarian
,
reason magazine
,
reason.com
,
reason.tv
,
reasontv
,
section 230
,
tucker carlson
,
ted cruz
,
nancy pelosi
,
josh hawley
,
free speech
    Thumbnail for Hong Kong Protesters Want Democracy, Accountability, Autonomy, and U.S. Support3:45
    Hong Kong Protesters Want Democracy, Accountability, Autonomy, and U.S. Support
    ReasonVids
    805 views
    Thumbnail for Who is John Galt? Behind the Scenes of Atlas Shrugged3:01
    Who is John Galt? Behind the Scenes of Atlas Shrugged
    ReasonVids
    907 views
    Thumbnail for DC Cop Waves Gun at Snowball Fight!5:09
    DC Cop Waves Gun at Snowball Fight!
    ReasonVids
    987 views
    Thumbnail for Brandy Harrington The Lion King5:02
    Brandy Harrington The Lion King
    mattknezz888
    37 views
    Thumbnail for What Last Tuesday Means for the Future | Live From The Lair4:57
    What Last Tuesday Means for the Future | Live From The Lair
    Terrence Popp
    493 views
    Thumbnail for WTF! I WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE FUGLY COVERUP TAT ON ITS ARM IS HIDING!1:15
    WTF! I WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE FUGLY COVERUP TAT ON ITS ARM IS HIDING!
    bestofupgoat
    157 views
    Thumbnail for theyre actually organized criminals1:22
    theyre actually organized criminals
    bestofupgoat
    503 views
    Thumbnail for Pastor Stephen Broden Preaches Renewed Mind, Renewed Life Part 31:25:15
    Pastor Stephen Broden Preaches Renewed Mind, Renewed Life Part 3
    AOUisgay
    380 views
    Thumbnail for Deejay Gold - I Wanna Feel You | Deejay GoldG3:01
    Deejay Gold - I Wanna Feel You | Deejay GoldG
    Djlisa
    160 views
    Thumbnail for Someone Found a Color 8mm Home Video from 1939 and the Quality is Amazing15:07
    Someone Found a Color 8mm Home Video from 1939 and the Quality is Amazing
    bestofpoal
    1354 views
    Thumbnail for Poop Wound Pariah: The Insanity of a Trans 304 | Ride and Roast45:15
    Poop Wound Pariah: The Insanity of a Trans 304 | Ride and Roast
    Terrence Popp
    487 views
    Thumbnail for How Much BS is Too Much? | Live From The Lair22:40
    How Much BS is Too Much? | Live From The Lair
    Terrence Popp
    448 views
    Thumbnail for MADtv GI Junkie Spishak (wait for it)1:45
    MADtv GI Junkie Spishak (wait for it)
    AOU
    1323 views
    Thumbnail for Treat the customer like they treat you0:24
    Treat the customer like they treat you
    bestofvoatxyz
    2297 views
    Thumbnail for White Knights and the Women Who Kill Them | Grunt Speak34:07
    White Knights and the Women Who Kill Them | Grunt Speak
    Terrence Popp
    446 views
    Thumbnail for The Truth About Creeps | Popp Culture30:40
    The Truth About Creeps | Popp Culture
    Terrence Popp
    1419 views
    Thumbnail for Subway.  Eat Shit.  Import the jeet, become the jeet.0:45
    Subway. Eat Shit. Import the jeet, become the jeet.
    bestofupgoat
    253 views
    Thumbnail for Trump's Syria Strike Won't Solve Any Problems But Could Make Everything Worse5:41
    Trump's Syria Strike Won't Solve Any Problems But Could Make Everything Worse
    ReasonVids
    971 views
    Thumbnail for Policing for Profit? California Towns Bill Residents Thousands for Nuisance Violations7:52
    Policing for Profit? California Towns Bill Residents Thousands for Nuisance Violations
    ReasonVids
    1155 views
    Thumbnail for How Cigarettes Destroy Your Lungs 😷 | Zack D. Films0:29
    How Cigarettes Destroy Your Lungs 😷 | Zack D. Films
    invidious
    119 views
    Thumbnail for Kanye is a nigger and a faggot.  Just a reminder.3:53
    Kanye is a nigger and a faggot. Just a reminder.
    bestofupgoat
    142 views
    Thumbnail for Chinese Dissident Ai Weiwei Explores the Tragedy of the Refugee Crisis3:31
    Chinese Dissident Ai Weiwei Explores the Tragedy of the Refugee Crisis
    ReasonVids
    1023 views
    Thumbnail for Remy: Courtesy of the Red, White & Blue (Toby Keith Civil Liberties Parody)2:42
    Remy: Courtesy of the Red, White & Blue (Toby Keith Civil Liberties Parody)
    ReasonVids
    900 views
    Thumbnail for 6 inches0:19
    6 inches
    bestofupgoat
    113 views
    Thumbnail for LGBTQ Church Gets Struck By Lightning And Burns Down0:23
    LGBTQ Church Gets Struck By Lightning And Burns Down
    AOUisgay
    493 views

points

Permalink
Reply
libertarian
,
reason magazine
,
reason.com
,
reason.tv
,
reasontv
,
section 230
,
tucker carlson
,
ted cruz
,
nancy pelosi
,
josh hawley
,
free speech
TOS  •  Add Keywords  •  Donate  •   Analytics  •   DMCA  •   Puzzle