HomeUploadUpload DirectHotlinkRandomAbouttheme toggle
Expand

The First Amendment and Government Property: Free Speech Rules (Episode 8)

Views:968
@ReasonVids

The five rules of the First Amendment and Government Property

Rule 1: A few forms of government property are treated as so-called "traditional public forums." There, the government generally can't exclude speech based on its content.

The classic examples are sidewalks and parks, as well as streets used for parades. Unless speech falls within one of the narrow First Amendment exceptions, the government can't restrict it. Such places are technically government property; but that gives the government no extra authority to control such speech.

The postal system is analogous. At least since the mid-1940s, the Supreme Court has held that the government can't exclude certain kinds of content from the mail.

Rule 2: Sometimes, the government deliberately opens up property or funds in order to promote a wide diversity of private speech, using objective criteria. Many public schools, for instance, let student groups use classrooms that aren't otherwise being used. Public libraries often offer rooms for meetings of community groups. Public universities might offer free e-mail accounts or web hosting to all students, and sometimes public universities offer money to student groups to publish newspapers or invite speakers.

These are called "limited public forums," and the government can limit them to particular speakers, or to particular kinds of speech. It can also have reasonable, viewpoint-neutral exclusions. But it can't impose viewpoint-based criteria—it can't, for instance, let all groups use a meeting room in a library but exclude racist groups.

Rule 3: A lot of government property is open to the public, but not for speech. Airports, for instance, are set up to promote transportation, not speaking; but people there will wear T-shirts with messages on them, talk to friends, maybe even approach strangers with leaflets. In these so-called "nonpublic forums," the rule is much like in limited public forums: Speech restrictions are allowed, but must be reasonable and viewpoint-neutral.

Rule 4:  Some government property is set up for the government itself to speak; and there, the government can pick and choose what viewpoints it conveys or endorses. The walls of most public buildings are an example; the government can choose what art to put up there, and it might refuse to display art that conveys ideas that it dislikes.

Likewise, when the government spends money to promote its own messages, it doesn't have to promote rival messages. It can have a National Endowment for Democracy without having to fund a National Endowment for Communism. It can put out ads supporting racial equality, without paying for ads supporting racism.

Sometimes there are close cases; for instance, when Texas authorized many kinds of license plate designs, but excluded Confederate flag designs, the Supreme Court split 5-to-4. The majority thought license plate designs were government speech, and the government could pick and choose which ones to allow, even when the government accepted dozens of designs requested by private groups. The dissent thought they were a limited public forum, in which viewpoint discrimination was forbidden because the government was supporting so many different forms of speech. But while there are close cases, many are pretty clear: The government often clearly promotes views it chose itself, and sometimes clearly promotes a wide range of private views.

Rule 5: Similar principles likely apply to government benefit programs, and not just to the provision of real estate or of money. Charitable tax exemptions, for instance, are likely a form of limited public forum: The government can discriminate based on content , but not based on viewpoint.

Likewise, the Supreme Court held that the government can't deny full trademark protection to trademarks that are seen as "disparaging," "scandalous," "immoral," or racist. Such restrictions, the Court said, were impermissibly viewpoint-based.

Of course, private property owners aren't bound by the First Amendment, whether they're distributing money or access to real estate. And, as we see, the government as property owner isn't bound by the First Amendment quite the same as it is when deciding whether to jail or fine them for their speech. But, except when it comes to the government's own speech, viewpoint discrimination is generally forbidden even on government property.
--
Written by Eugene Volokh, who is a First Amendment law professor at UCLA.
Produced and edited by Austin Bragg, who is not.

This is the eighth episode of Free Speech Rules, a video series on free speech and the law. Volokh is the co-founder of The Volokh Conspiracy, a blog hosted at Reason.com.

This is not legal advice.
If this were legal advice, it would be followed by a bill.
Please use responsibly.

Music: "Lobby Time," by Kevin MacLeod (Incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b…

libertarian
,
reason magazine
,
reason.com
,
reason.tv
,
reasontv
    Thumbnail for Judge Napolitano: Enough Evidence 'to Justify About Three or Four Articles of Impeachment.'28:47
    Judge Napolitano: Enough Evidence 'to Justify About Three or Four Articles of Impeachment.'
    ReasonVids
    998 views
    Thumbnail for In the movie No Country for Old Men the only person who Evil stood down to was the obese secretary that told him to fuck off. She STOOD HER GROUND0:58
    In the movie No Country for Old Men the only person who Evil stood down to was the obese secretary that told him to fuck off. She STOOD HER GROUND
    bestofgoatpen
    2185 views
    Thumbnail for Puerto Rico's Infrastructure Reniassance  - David Álvarez on Public-Private Investment42:56
    Puerto Rico's Infrastructure Reniassance - David Álvarez on Public-Private Investment
    ReasonVids
    847 views
    Thumbnail for The Growing Power of the Presidency12:50
    The Growing Power of the Presidency
    ReasonVids
    1008 views
    Thumbnail for What We Saw at Colorado's Cannabis Business Summit4:23
    What We Saw at Colorado's Cannabis Business Summit
    ReasonVids
    927 views
    Thumbnail for Pionier - I Believe3:43
    Pionier - I Believe
    bestofsaidit
    694 views
    Thumbnail for TittyPussy1:26
    TittyPussy
    AOU
    1558 views
    Thumbnail for The Whitest Kids U'Know Season 4 Episode 623:42
    The Whitest Kids U'Know Season 4 Episode 6
    wkuk.topic
    447 views
    Thumbnail for Remy: Spiderwebs (No Doubt IRS Parody)2:10
    Remy: Spiderwebs (No Doubt IRS Parody)
    ReasonVids
    981 views
    Thumbnail for How Prohibition Made Pot More Potent: Q&A with Auburn University's Mark Thornton5:18
    How Prohibition Made Pot More Potent: Q&A with Auburn University's Mark Thornton
    ReasonVids
    757 views
    Thumbnail for Campaign for Liberty's Norm Singleton on Obamacare, Auditing the Fed, and the Libertarian Moment9:43
    Campaign for Liberty's Norm Singleton on Obamacare, Auditing the Fed, and the Libertarian Moment
    ReasonVids
    950 views
    Thumbnail for Cars slipping, sliding and crashing in heavy snow in Gloucestershire | Urban Pictures UK4:14
    Cars slipping, sliding and crashing in heavy snow in Gloucestershire | Urban Pictures UK
    invidious
    220 views
    Thumbnail for Porker of The Month for October 2010: Debbie Wasserman Schultz!1:40
    Porker of The Month for October 2010: Debbie Wasserman Schultz!
    ReasonVids
    902 views
    Thumbnail for Lefty Media Suddenly Against Immigration8:50
    Lefty Media Suddenly Against Immigration
    AmericanRenaissance
    1405 views
    Thumbnail for Koch LA Times Buyout Enrages Protesters: What We Saw at the "Save Our News" Rally4:29
    Koch LA Times Buyout Enrages Protesters: What We Saw at the "Save Our News" Rally
    ReasonVids
    845 views
    Thumbnail for It's Time to Legalize Hemp! Q&A with CEO of Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps2:59
    It's Time to Legalize Hemp! Q&A with CEO of Dr. Bronner's Magic Soaps
    ReasonVids
    962 views
    Thumbnail for COVID Proves Andrew Yang’s UBI Won’t Work6:33
    COVID Proves Andrew Yang’s UBI Won’t Work
    ReasonVids
    904 views
    Thumbnail for Shameless Promotion for the NPI 2016 Fall Conference6:19
    Shameless Promotion for the NPI 2016 Fall Conference
    murdochmurdoch
    1393 views
    Thumbnail for Is It Time to Abolish Three Strikes? "The Return" Follows Newly Released Inmates Into the World13:46
    Is It Time to Abolish Three Strikes? "The Return" Follows Newly Released Inmates Into the World
    ReasonVids
    811 views
    Thumbnail for How to Stop America's 'Endless Wars'8:50
    How to Stop America's 'Endless Wars'
    ReasonVids
    1039 views
    Thumbnail for ATTN POLICE: Enough Already with the Jaywalking Stings! Don't Cops Have Better Things To Do?3:08
    ATTN POLICE: Enough Already with the Jaywalking Stings! Don't Cops Have Better Things To Do?
    ReasonVids
    899 views
    Thumbnail for Stressful situation0:58
    Stressful situation
    bestofnab
    5793 views
    Thumbnail for The Truth about Github Copilot // AI Programming First Look | Fireship8:30
    The Truth about Github Copilot // AI Programming First Look | Fireship
    invidious
    288 views
    Thumbnail for PRESIDENT - Fearless3:39
    PRESIDENT - Fearless
    invidious
    13 views
    Thumbnail for GPT4ALL Running on My Mac! World Knowledge and Analysis on my Lap? Get the Weights Before The Ban! | Tech-Fintech-Crypto Meanderings 4:42
    GPT4ALL Running on My Mac! World Knowledge and Analysis on my Lap? Get the Weights Before The Ban! | Tech-Fintech-Crypto Meanderings
    tech.topic
    565 views

points

Permalink
Reply
libertarian
,
reason magazine
,
reason.com
,
reason.tv
,
reasontv
TOS  •  Add Keywords  •  Donate  •   Analytics  •   DMCA  •   Puzzle