Reason's Nick Gillespie interviews Judge Andrew Napolitano about federal obstruction of justice laws and the historical and constitutional context of Trump's presidency.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
http://youtube.com/reasontvLike us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magazine/Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/reasonSubscribe to our podcast at Apple Podcasts:
https://goo.gl/az3a7aReason is the planet's leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines.
----------------
Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News has long argued for libertarian positions on the nation's largest cable news network, consistently holding George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and now Donald Trump accountable for alleged abuses of power.
In Napolitano's analysis, the Mueller report on Russian interference in the 2016 election lays out multiple instances in which President Trump attempted to interfere with the investigation, thus making him guilty under federal laws governing the obstruction of justice.
The president responded with a series of hostile tweets claiming, among other things, that Napolitano had asked to be named to the Supreme Court and requested a pardon for a mutual friend.
Napolitano sat down with Reason's Nick Gillespie to defend his name, lay out his case against the president, explain why Attorney General William Barr has been bad since his days in the George H.W. Bush administration, and put Donald Trump's presidency in a historical and constitutional context.
Hosted by Nick Gillespie. Edited by Ian Keyser. Intro by Meredith Bragg. Cameras by Jim Epstein and Kevin Alexander.
Photo Credits:
2009 Owen DB/Black Star/Newscom
Andrew Harrer/CNP/AdMedia/Newscom
LUCAS JACKSON/REUTERS/Newscom
points